The Legal Examiner Mark The Legal Examiner Mark The Legal Examiner Mark search twitter facebook feed linkedin instagram google-plus avvo phone envelope checkmark mail-reply spinner error close
Skip to main content

Reuters reports a defense verdict in a trial involving Vioxx. According to the report, the seven member jury found adequate warnings provided to the prescribing physician–but inadequate warnings to the plaintiff. Ultimately, it seems, the jury found that the plaintiff–68 years old–would have suffered a heart attack with or without Vioxx.

Comments are closed.

Of Interest